Joined
·
24 Posts
Black Box
1 - 15 of 15 Posts
Joined
·
463 Posts
We call it "snapshots". It is a predefined list of parameters which are captured when an event takes place. This has been done or many years for the mine purpose of troubleshooting. In some cases where their are warantee concerns, extra information is gathered. This information is stored in the ECU so there is not a separate box. It is saved in NVM so the OEM can access the information with a service tool.
Is there a way to erase that info?
Another question is what "events" cause the info to be saved. Airbag deployment is obviously one of them. Are there others?
Bank Robbery, kidnapping, moonshine running and any sort of tax evasion.
Joined
·
463 Posts
In the products I a aware of (not Ford) the only way to remove this informtion is with a file which will write all the NVM to "FF". Normal flash files will not write to these memory locations. As stated, tuning companies who have reverse engineered the code could determine where this information is stored in memory, but I doubt that is a business they want to enter. Lots of this information is very useful and cuts down on dealer troubleshooting time...saving us money.
Joined
·
1,902 Posts
#1 can it be removed without harming the operation of the car
#2 can it be lied to?
#2 can it be lied to?
Joined
·
1,902 Posts
I have made it a lifelong point in trusting as few people as possible and it has paid handsomely!
Joined
·
1,103 Posts
Lets say a reckless driver hits your family and there were no witnesses but the data captured in their vehicle's computer could show they were at fault. Would you want a legal process in place where the law enforcement could access this to prove your innocence and have their insurance pay for your injuries and loss?
I'm not going to tell someone that doesn't like regulations that their beliefs are wrong but when it comes to questions and statements that seem to come up periodically from owners worrying about government intervention and spying it's important to understand how the system works on a technical level, what data is recorded, and the legal side of who can access that data. Since airbags first started appearing on a widespread basis over twenty years ago there have been control modules that record varying amount of data. As time and technology has progressed this has become more and more common and the amount of data captured has increased.
In the mid-'90s for example it would be common for the airbag controller to capture data in a continual loop and when an event triggered deployment it would capture to memory the last few seconds of this data. It was very primitive and many times would only include self-diagnostic data for the airbag system, such as whether it was fully functional at the time of impact as well as some rudimentary vehicle data like if the seatbelt was latched, deceleration forces, and vehicle speed.
As time has progressed more and more systems in a car are communicating with each other and those computer controllers are becoming more powerful with access to a wider range of data and logging ability. The airbag controller now has access to and commonly records up to a minute or more data prior to an impact and can log vehicle speed, engine rpm, was the brake pedal applied, was ABS active, stability control data including vehicle yaw and lateral accelerometer data, steering wheel angles and so on. This can provide a much better picture to recreate the events from that led up to the collision or triggering event.
In that regard I'm personally less concerned about data being stored as compared to the first generation systems where there weren't enough parameters stored and for not a long enough sampling period to give a true picture of what happened and how someone was driving. For example, on early systems they might only show a few seconds of your speed up to the collision but now a better picture can be represented of how the driver was acting to give a truer picture of their guilt or innocence.
In most jurisdictions this data cannot be obtained without a search warrant and you have the option of legal representation to build a legal case for or against accessing to this data in your or someone else's vehicle. To go off on a tangent for a moment, I'm big on personal responsibility and if I do something stupid I'm prepared to pay the consequences. That's why I try not to put myself in situations where I could injure someone else and why if something outside my control happens that I'm responsible and have high insurance limits. And should I be innocent I'd much rather have a true, full picture available stored in the computer/controller of my car and any other party involved to build a better case of the circumstances.
In addition to the legal authority to access this data there's also the technical side of how this is done. There hasn't been an industry standard for the format the data is recorded let alone what data should be recorded. This has led to each manufacturer developing their own standards with no common interface. There are some higher end specialty scan tools available to acquire data from some vehicles but not for others. A recent example of where this was a problem was the cases of Toyota models accused of unintended acceleration. Some of the modules that capture data on the collision were deemed proprietary and Toyota at first didn't want to share the data and their tools used to access it. If there was an open standard then law enforcement might have been able to pull this data and an analyst could determine if there was a vehicle fault or the driver just pressed the wrong pedal.
Your vehicle also collects other data for the powertrain controller that is mandated by US federal law with regards to the on-board diagnostics. This includes fault data that sets an emission related check engine code/light and can include a freeze frame or sampling of engine sensor data at the time the fault occurred which can be valuable for a technician working on the vehicle since they might be able to trace or figured out what triggered the event. This can help get your car fixed faster and should something new crop up that hasn't been seen before let the automaker collect that data when you take your car in to be serviced and be transmitted back to their engineering teams.
What has been controversial in recent years is the proposed standards for the next, third generation of on-board diagnostics (OBD-III) and talk of wireless data access and automatic reporting of vehicle health to government air resource regulatory agencies, etc. This probably isn't as likely to happen but some good things that could come from the next generation systems is more widespread standards to define what interface, what data is captured, in what format and so on is stored and under what circumstances. From an automotive enthusiast who works on my own vehicles I look forward to this as a good thing since it will make scan tools and other diagnostic aids less expensive and force automakers to follow industry standards and publish information like interface data.
If you're still worried about what is in your Focus ST read the owner's manual and the service (shop) manuals about the data that is recoded and under what circumstances. There is no easy way to change this data as it would require reverse engineering the airbag control module as well as the powertrain controller, of which would require re-writing the entire operating code an not just reverse engineering the tables and settings to alter how the current code works (such as how most tuning solutions work for adjusting engine fuel and ignition parameters). I just don't see the business case for it and I personally don't mind how and what is captured anyway.
If this is something that does bother you you'll find it easier to ditch your cell phone, other modern electronics, and never use the internet. They capture much more invasive data on your location, buying history, personal preferences and so on than what limited amount of data your car captures only during a powertrain fault triggering event or in a collision.
I'm not going to tell someone that doesn't like regulations that their beliefs are wrong but when it comes to questions and statements that seem to come up periodically from owners worrying about government intervention and spying it's important to understand how the system works on a technical level, what data is recorded, and the legal side of who can access that data. Since airbags first started appearing on a widespread basis over twenty years ago there have been control modules that record varying amount of data. As time and technology has progressed this has become more and more common and the amount of data captured has increased.
In the mid-'90s for example it would be common for the airbag controller to capture data in a continual loop and when an event triggered deployment it would capture to memory the last few seconds of this data. It was very primitive and many times would only include self-diagnostic data for the airbag system, such as whether it was fully functional at the time of impact as well as some rudimentary vehicle data like if the seatbelt was latched, deceleration forces, and vehicle speed.
As time has progressed more and more systems in a car are communicating with each other and those computer controllers are becoming more powerful with access to a wider range of data and logging ability. The airbag controller now has access to and commonly records up to a minute or more data prior to an impact and can log vehicle speed, engine rpm, was the brake pedal applied, was ABS active, stability control data including vehicle yaw and lateral accelerometer data, steering wheel angles and so on. This can provide a much better picture to recreate the events from that led up to the collision or triggering event.
In that regard I'm personally less concerned about data being stored as compared to the first generation systems where there weren't enough parameters stored and for not a long enough sampling period to give a true picture of what happened and how someone was driving. For example, on early systems they might only show a few seconds of your speed up to the collision but now a better picture can be represented of how the driver was acting to give a truer picture of their guilt or innocence.
In most jurisdictions this data cannot be obtained without a search warrant and you have the option of legal representation to build a legal case for or against accessing to this data in your or someone else's vehicle. To go off on a tangent for a moment, I'm big on personal responsibility and if I do something stupid I'm prepared to pay the consequences. That's why I try not to put myself in situations where I could injure someone else and why if something outside my control happens that I'm responsible and have high insurance limits. And should I be innocent I'd much rather have a true, full picture available stored in the computer/controller of my car and any other party involved to build a better case of the circumstances.
In addition to the legal authority to access this data there's also the technical side of how this is done. There hasn't been an industry standard for the format the data is recorded let alone what data should be recorded. This has led to each manufacturer developing their own standards with no common interface. There are some higher end specialty scan tools available to acquire data from some vehicles but not for others. A recent example of where this was a problem was the cases of Toyota models accused of unintended acceleration. Some of the modules that capture data on the collision were deemed proprietary and Toyota at first didn't want to share the data and their tools used to access it. If there was an open standard then law enforcement might have been able to pull this data and an analyst could determine if there was a vehicle fault or the driver just pressed the wrong pedal.
Your vehicle also collects other data for the powertrain controller that is mandated by US federal law with regards to the on-board diagnostics. This includes fault data that sets an emission related check engine code/light and can include a freeze frame or sampling of engine sensor data at the time the fault occurred which can be valuable for a technician working on the vehicle since they might be able to trace or figured out what triggered the event. This can help get your car fixed faster and should something new crop up that hasn't been seen before let the automaker collect that data when you take your car in to be serviced and be transmitted back to their engineering teams.
What has been controversial in recent years is the proposed standards for the next, third generation of on-board diagnostics (OBD-III) and talk of wireless data access and automatic reporting of vehicle health to government air resource regulatory agencies, etc. This probably isn't as likely to happen but some good things that could come from the next generation systems is more widespread standards to define what interface, what data is captured, in what format and so on is stored and under what circumstances. From an automotive enthusiast who works on my own vehicles I look forward to this as a good thing since it will make scan tools and other diagnostic aids less expensive and force automakers to follow industry standards and publish information like interface data.
If you're still worried about what is in your Focus ST read the owner's manual and the service (shop) manuals about the data that is recoded and under what circumstances. There is no easy way to change this data as it would require reverse engineering the airbag control module as well as the powertrain controller, of which would require re-writing the entire operating code an not just reverse engineering the tables and settings to alter how the current code works (such as how most tuning solutions work for adjusting engine fuel and ignition parameters). I just don't see the business case for it and I personally don't mind how and what is captured anyway.
If this is something that does bother you you'll find it easier to ditch your cell phone, other modern electronics, and never use the internet. They capture much more invasive data on your location, buying history, personal preferences and so on than what limited amount of data your car captures only during a powertrain fault triggering event or in a collision.
Joined
·
1,902 Posts
Your words have sway and your argument, persuasive. I DO realize that our personal information is more public than ever.
It is one of the reasons I have a dinosaur cell phone that is as smart as a ran over ****. I suppose that it, as everything, is eventual.
But I STILL suspicion it...
It is one of the reasons I have a dinosaur cell phone that is as smart as a ran over ****. I suppose that it, as everything, is eventual.
But I STILL suspicion it...
Joined
·
1,103 Posts
Nothing wrong with that and it's good to be wary about giving up too much personal information and potential loss of privacy rights. That's why when this type of regulation is brought up it's good to read the intent and what it will actually do vice reading too much into the sensational journalism and internet blogs crying it's the end of the world and big brother will know everywhere you're driving and how fast you're getting there.
Speaking of the phone, many people at the turn of the 20th century thought it would ruin society and people would stop talking to each other in person and it did end up having a big impact on how we communicate. Fast-forward to today and this generation is saying the same thing about cell phones and social networks on the internet. If you lean more towards being a Luddite and think we're losing too much privacy and technology is going to radically alter society you're probably right in one regard, there is change and the world never stops progressing but we can't put the tech back into the box it came from. The key is to understand the changes and protest and rally against aspects of how they're implemented and not just against the technology itself.
Speaking of the phone, many people at the turn of the 20th century thought it would ruin society and people would stop talking to each other in person and it did end up having a big impact on how we communicate. Fast-forward to today and this generation is saying the same thing about cell phones and social networks on the internet. If you lean more towards being a Luddite and think we're losing too much privacy and technology is going to radically alter society you're probably right in one regard, there is change and the world never stops progressing but we can't put the tech back into the box it came from. The key is to understand the changes and protest and rally against aspects of how they're implemented and not just against the technology itself.
Joined
·
1,902 Posts
You are one well said fellow! While not being a Luddite, I DO enjoy technology, I would indeed say that I am a paranoiac about the ways that technology can be misused.
And paranoia is merely a state of perfect awareness...
And paranoia is merely a state of perfect awareness...
1 - 15 of 15 Posts
Join the discussion
